Critics on Article 1 of the 1987 Philippine Constitution free essay sample

First, it violates Article I, which guarantees the integrity of the national territory of the Philippines because it divided the Philippines into three states. Second, it violates Section 1, Article II of the Constitution, which provides for the establishment of democratic and republic States by replacing it with three States organized as a confederation. Third, it violates Section 22, Article II of the Constitution, which, while recognizing and promoting the rights of indigenous cultural communities, provides for national unity and development.Fourth, it violates Section 15, Article X of the Constitution, which, provides for autonomous regions in Muslim Mindanao and in the Cordilleras within the framework of national sovereignty as well as territorial integrity of the Republic of the Philippines. Fifth, it violates the sovereignty of the Republic of the Philippines. Can the Philippines extend its national territory? Philippines cant even reclaim Mindanao from those al qaeda wannabee s abu sayaf. how you expect it can take over and run additional territory?C. We will write a custom essay sample on Critics on Article 1 of the 1987 Philippine Constitution or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page described the location as off Subic Bay in Zambales. Chinese media said the encounter was near Scarborough Shoal. The Philippine government version of the location of the high seas collision, given two days after the incident, was closer to that of China. Our Defense Assistant Secretary said it was 125 nautical miles off Subic, near the Scarborough Shoal, which is 123 nautical miles from Subic. Under the baseline law, Scarborough shoal is part of Philippine territory classified as a regime of islands. Inclusion of the shoal in Philippine territory was protested by China, which also claims the shoal as well as the whole of South China Sea. Critics: From the three versions of the location of the collision, it can be concluded that it is in Philippine territory. It can be likened to two quarreling bullies bringing their fight into the front yard a third party, which, in this case, is the Philippines. What did the Philippines do after seeing the two intruders fighting in its front yard?Our Press Secretary showed his ignorance of the baseline law said the the two ships were outside Philippine waters. Suggestion: Someone, please give our Press Secretary a copy of the baseline law and the UNCLOS (United Nations Commission on the Law of the Sea) treaty, which the Philippines signed. Underline please the part where maritime regimes or zones are defined: territorial sea (12 nautical miles from the baseline), contiguous zone (24 nm), economic exclusive zone (200 nm), continental shelf (200 nm) and extended continental shelf (350 nm).Critics: Don’t forget to give our Press Secretary a copy of the Philippine Constitution and bookmark Article I, The National Territory which says. The national territory comprises the Philippine archipelago, with all the islands and waters embraced therein, and all other territories over which the Philippines the Philippines has sovereignty or jurisdiction, consisting of its terrestrial, fluvial and aerial domains, including its territorial sea, the seabed, the subsoil, the insular shelves, and other submarine areas. The waters around, between, and connecting the islands of the archipelago, regardless of their breadth and dimensions, form part of the internal waters of the Philippines. Our Defense Assistant Secretary said there’s nothing to be concerned about because the incident occurred inside the country’s 200-mile exclusive economic zone but outside the country’s 12 nautical mile territorial waters. Our concern is that we must be sure that no foreign vessels enter our territorial waters without authority. We cannot prohibit them from passing through (in economic zones), he said.Critics: It is understandable for Philippine officials to downplay the incident because what can they do? Protest the intrusion of the US and China? One of the four attributes of a state is sovereignty (others are people, territory and government), the supreme right of the state to command obedience within the state. Hard Critics: The incident showed the sad reality that we couldn’t command obedience from intruders in our own territory. Without sovereignty, there is no state. What are we then?